Support our effort to cover the UN honestly.

Here for more options​​

UN prepares for a world of Geospatial Information

 

August 2016:​  On 27 July, in a little noted decision on "Cartography," the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) made a change that will have more impact on the future of Sustainable Development than all the meetings of its High Level Political Forum          Read More

to win in Afghanistan President trump should emulate hercules 


21 August 2017: The renewed effort being announced today in the long and heroic American war against terrorism in Afghanistan is the result of much expert deliberation but it cannot succeed without incorporating a strategy legend says Hercules used to defeat the giant wrestler Antaeus.


Antaeus was invincible as a wrestler because he was the son of the Earth and every fall increased his strength. Hercules won by holding him up in the air, away from his source of strength. 


The Antaeus Strategy

In Afghanistan, the Antaeus strategy involves cutting off the Taliban's capacity to finance its depredations endlessly through drug trafficking. Without drug money the terrorists have no strength. They will not be able to pay their fighters and supporters in Pakistan will quickly lose interest in providing them with guns, ammunition, supplies and safe havens.


So how can the United States cut off Taliban access to drug money?


With a tactic the United States used to end the lawless terror of organized crime during the 1930s: by repealing alcohol prohibition. Without prohibition, there was no profit for criminals in alcohol, and all over the country bootleggers and their mafia networks went broke.


The same thing will happen  with drugs, most of which are cheap and easily made vegetable derivatives. Without prohibition, no criminal will find it profitable to make or sell them, especially if government clinics provide them free.   


Implementing the Strategy

Implementing the strategy will involve pulling out of the prohibitionist drug treaty the League of Nations began enforcing nearly a century ago and the United Nations has strengthened and strengthened into the current hugely destructive platform for crime. The global  war on drugs waged to impose drug prohibitions has not had a single success in the last seven decades; on the contrary, it has caused a steady increase in corruption and violence, and promoted the biggest assault on freedom and individual liberties in human history.  


To end the madness the United States can begin by pulling out of the existing prohibitionist drug treaties and taking the lead at the United Nations to repeal them altogether.


Latin American nations have already done much of the groundwork necessary for that to happen at a special session of the General Assembly next year. Only the determined opposition of the United Kingdom, which profits enormously from the $500 billion annual drug trade, stands in the way of action. 


Multiple, Wide Ranging Benefits

The beauty of the Antaeus strategy is that it will put out of business not only the Taliban in Afghanistan but the Mexican drug cartels and the local drug runners responsible for the opioid crisis in America.


Without pushers to spread the drug habit to new victims the crisis will become manageable and can be brought to an end at a small fraction of the current cost of the "war on drugs."  An added benefit will be the easing of a heavy burden on health insurers.

 

 

ecosoc HLPF to world: We talk a good game but we're actually for organized crime


10 August 2017: The orotund 5,117-word Declaration  issued by the  Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) at its high-level political forum in July has now been published, and is notable for not containing a single word about action against drug trafficking, money laundering or organized crime.


Those are the most important factors fueling conflict and humanitarian crises around the world, and are thus primary obstacles to sustainable development (covered under Goal 16 of Agenda 2030). The Secretary-General's report presented to ECOSOC did not mention them, and the Ministerial failure to rectify that in the Declaration is significant.


Fortunately, in taking note of the Secretary-General's report, the ministers "Reiterate that, while our review in 2017 emphasizes Sustainable Development Goals 1, 2, 3, 5, 9 and 14, as well as Goal 17, the integrated, indivisible and universal nature of the Goals makes it essential that we pay particular attention to leveraging synergies and co-benefits, while avoiding or minimizing trade-offs."


That can be taken as a shot across the Secretariat's bow that Goal 16 better feature in its next report.  


Why is the UN Silent?

The reticence of the UN Secretariat in dealing with drug trafficking, organized crime and money laundering is not difficult to explain: they are fiercely protected interests of the United Kingdom, carried over from the days of Empire when it fought two major "Opium Wars." 


As its colonies dwindled in the 1960s and 1970s, Britain built up a global system of "tax havens" to launder the proceeds of its extensive drug trafficking network. That system developed into the central element of global organized crime networks, serving gun runners, human traffickers, garden variety smugglers and a wide variety of tax dodgers as revealed in the 2016 dump of 11.5 million "Panama Papers."


Britain can manipulate the UN to protect its interests because it has a superb diplomatic service that is miles ahead of any other in jockeying for bureaucratic advantage. It also has a vulture-like range in detecting corruptible talent.  Officials who do its bidding are rewarded with easy promotions and plum assignments; those with integrity find themselves sidelined.


The Segue of Amina Mohammad

The most prominent example of that phenomenon recently has been the segue of Amina Mohammad from coordinating the negotiation of Agenda 2030 to the office of Deputy Secretary-General.  As coordinator she ensured that the issues of drug trafficking, money laundering and terrorism were contained to one sub-paragraph of Goal 16.  Now, as the official overseeing reports of the Secretary-General on the implementation of Agenda 2030 Ms. Mohammad is in a position to omit all mention of the inconvenient issues.   


That has happened at a time when the African Group repeatedly underlined the need to deal with the illicit drain of resources from developing countries, and the Latin American Group mounted a multi-year effort to change the prohibitionist international approach to drugs.


The Potential of Agenda 2030

Agenda 2030 has the potential to present money laundering and drug trafficking as interdependent issues. If governments approach them as legal issues, abolishing "tax havens" (which should be more appropriately called "criminal havens") and decriminalizing drugs, it would pull the rug out from under the entire international economy of crime, violence and war.  


Without the current prohibitionist approach, drug trafficking would not be profitable to organized crime for most psychotropic substances are cheap vegetable derivatives not worth pushing. The decriminalization of drugs would thus quickly render the problem of abuse a manageable mental health issue. 


As drug trafficking is a major source of income for terrorist groups and all crime is heavily dependent on money laundering, a comprehensive approach to those issues would also quickly make arms trafficking and supporting conflict very difficult.  



NY Court convicts Chinese billionaire of Bribing UN Bigs to hijack south-south Role


28 July 2017: One of China's richest men, Ng Lap Seng, was convicted yesterday in a  New York federal court on six counts of  bribery, conspiracy and money laundering. Acting U.S. Attorney Joon H. Kim said that Ng had corrupted United Nations officials at the "highest levels" to become his "private band of profiteers."


The prosecution charged that Ng had tried between 2010 and 2015 to hijack to China the role of the UN Office of South-South Cooperation (SSC) in New York. He was accused of paying millions of dollars to the President of the General Assembly, John Ashe, and  Dominican Republic Ambassador Francis Lorenzo, in a bid to have the General Assembly endorse his plan to build a South-South conference center in Macau, where he owned a hotel, a marina, a condominium complex, a heliport and a shopping center.


Ashe and Lorenzo were arrested in October 2015; both were released on bail, the former pleading not guilty and the latter pleading guilty. Ng was also arrested and has been under house arrest in his  luxury Manhattan apartment. After the conviction, Ng's lawyer announced that it would be appealed.


Meanwhile: Another Deal that Needs Attention

While the Ng case been in the courts, the UN Development Program (UNDP) has signed a "Partnership Agreement" on South-South Cooperation with a Chinese law firm (sic). On 21 November 2016, UNDP and the Beijing Yingke Law Firm, which describes itself as "the biggest own-operated law firm in Asia Pacific," agreed "to support the global coalition of think tank networks to expand research and knowledge production and sharing for South-South Cooperation underpinning the implementation of the 2030 Agenda."


"The partnership will also support deepening the understanding of legal environment and policy coordination related to South-South and Triangular Cooperation."  At a signing ceremony in New York, Sarah Poole, Deputy Director of UNDP’s Bureau for Policy and Programme Support, emphasized the "importance of strengthening the legal environment and policy coordination for effective South-South and Triangular Cooperation, saying “In South-South Cooperation, it is often the public-private partnership at play that implements strategic programmes across developing countries.”


China's Disrespect of Law

Ms Poole did not address the issue of China's disrespect for law in its domestic governance and in its relations with other developing countries in iSout-East Asia, the Tibetan plateau and South Asia.

According to a UNDP Press release, "policy coordination and the legal environment for South-South cooperation is one of the priority research pillars of the South-South Global Thinkers Initiative -- the Global Coalition of Think Tank Networks for South-South Cooperation supported by UNDP and the United Nations Office for South-South Cooperation (UNOSSC)."


"The Global Coalition was established to foster engagement of the think tank networks of the South on harnessing knowledge and innovative solutions to advance frontier thinking and policy advocacy in South-South Cooperation for sustainable development."

Mr. Xiangrong Mei, Chairman of Yingke Global Board speaking at the signing ceremony, expressed gratitude at "the opportunity to partner with the South-South Global Thinkers initiative., and said his firm would continue contributing "support, knowledge, and expertise to South-South Cooperation" for sustainable development goals ."

Also present at the ceremony was Mr. Jorge Chediek, Envoy of the UN Secretary General and Director of the UN Office for South-South Cooperation.


No one present expressed an opinion on whether the United Nations should be opening the door to a critically important international development process for a "law  firm" from a brutally lawless country. Given Mr. Ng's criminal conviction and the clear effort by the Chinese government to gain a potentially deeply negative strategic role in South-South Cooperation, the matter deserves focused attention at the next meeting of the General Assembly's High-Level Committee on SSC.  



A TRALFAMADORIAN TAKE ON HIGH-LEVEL FORUM ON FINANCING DEVELOPMENT 


20 May 2017: Reading the draft Outcome document of the second High-Level ECOSOC Forum on Financing for Development (22-25 May) brings to mind Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse-Five. Both are essentially tragic but shot through with the dark comedy of cant, myopia and insanity. Commenting on it makes me feel like a Tralfamadorian trying vainly to communicate impending danger to a bar filled with merry drunks. (For those who have forgotten or have never read the book, a Tralfamadorian is a two-foot alien shaped like a toilet brush and able to see the future.)

                                                                                                                                  Read More



BRITAIN AND UNITED STATES: THE UNTOLD STORY


The United States and Britain have a long history of political animosity dating back to the 18th Century War of Independence but the strong cultural ties between the two countries have obscured that record. Modern transatlantic differences first came into focus in August 1941, when Prime Minister Winston Churchill (1874-1965) and President Franklin Roosevelt (1882-1945) met on a battleship anchored in Newfoundland’s Placentia Bay to declare a set of common war aims.             Read More   


$3.4 BILLION LOSS AT UN PENSION FUND JOGS ASSEMBLY


19 December 2016: In a resolution on the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund the General Assembly expresses concern that it suffered $3.4 billion in losses due to foreign exchange factors during the 2014-2015 biennium. It urges the Secretary-General to "employ suitable procedures and tools to mitigate foreign exchange losses as well as develop an internal mechanism to monitor, evaluate and manage" such losses or gains. ​      Read More


STRIDENT High commissioner for human rights can't figure out why he's SHUT OUT


13 September 2016: UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein opened the 33rd session of the UN Human Rights Council by complaining about"an emerging pattern: the growing refusal on the part of an increasing number of Member States to grant OHCHR, or the human rights mechanisms, access" when it "is requested explicitly, or in other instances to engage with us."           Read more  


​THE WORLD'S TOP STATE MILITARY SPENDERS AND CORPORATE WAR PROFITEERS 

13 May 2017: The following list reflects information published by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

TOP STATE MILITARY SPENDERS


                                     %GDP            Per Capita                  $ Billion                     % Increase                                                                                $                                                                 2007-2016

​United States              3.3                 1886                                611                                      4.8
China                              1.9                   156                                215                                  118
Russia                             5.3                   483                                  69.2                                 87
Saudi Arabia              10.0                 1978                                 63.7                                 20
India                               2.5                       42                                 55.9                                 54
France                            2.3                    862                                 55.7                                    2.8
Britain                            1.9                    741                                 48.3                                  12
Japan                             1.0                    365                                 46.1                                    2.5
Germany                       1.2                    509                                 41.1                                    6.8
South Korea                2.7                    729                                 36.8                                  35
Italy                                1.5                     467                                 27.9                                 16
Australia                       2.0                  1013                                 24.6                                 29
Brazil                              1.3                   113                                  23.7                                 18
UAE                                 5.7                 2504                                  22.8                               123
Israel                              5.8                 2194                                  18.0                                  19


TOP ARMS MANUFACTURERS

             Corporation               HQ                          Arms Sales                 #Employees
                                             $ Billion
Lockheed Martin            USA                           36.44*                           126,000
Boeing                                USA                           27.96                             `61,000
BAE Systems                     UK                             25.51                               82,000
Raytheon                           USA                           21.78                               61,000
Northrop Grumman      USA                           20.06                               65,000
General Dynamics          USA                           19.24                               99,900
Airbus Group                 Europe                        12.86*                           136,500
United Technologies    USA                               9.50*                          197,200
Leonardo**                       Italy                              9.30                              47,160  
L3 Communications      USA                              8.77                              38,000
Thales                                France                          8.10                              62,190
Huntington Ingalls        USA                               6.74                              35,500

Almaz-Antey                   Russia                            6.62                               N/A
Safran                                France                           5.02                              70,090
Harris                                 USA                                4.92                               21,000

* They have large non-military revenues  ** Formerly Finmeccanica

      

Chinese genocide in Tibet draws rare UN protest   Read More   

Chinese actions recall 1961 General Assembly resolution on  Tibet self-determination 


General Assembly 


Miroslav Lajčák, Minister of Foreign and European Affairs of Slovakia, was elected President of the 72nd session of the General Assembly on 31 May 2017.For details see here.

Arrangements for 72nd Session General Debate: download pdf report 


Dates of Assembly Debates Until 2026
The first Information document of the 71st session of the General Assembly lists the dates of annual 9-day opening debates until 2026. A/INf/71/1 of 12 January 2017 provides the following information:

72nd session opens 12 September 2017; General Debate begins 19 September
73rd session opens 18 September 2018; General Debate begins 25 September
73rd session opens 17 September 2019; General Debate begins 30 September
74th session opens 15 September 2020; General Debate begins 22 September
76th session opens 14 September 2021; General Debate begins 21 September
77th session opens 13 September 2022; General Debate begins 20 September
78th session opens 12 September 2023; General Debate begins 25 September
79th session begins 17 September 2024; General Debate begins 24 September
80th session opens 16 September 2025; General Debate begins 23 September
81st session opens 15 September 2026; General Debate begins 22 September

​ 

  • There are two-day “high-level political forums” convened by the President of the General Assembly at the beginning of each session of the General Assembly (resolution 67/290).
  • There are High-level Political Forums required every four years under Assembly auspices (resolution 70/1), the next one set for 2019.
  • There is the High-level Dialogue on Financing for Development, held back-to-back with the periodic high-level political forum (resolution 69/313).


If you read our coverage of the high-level UN proceedings in 2016, it will be clear that they do not add much value to the consideration of various issues.  The story on the Outcome document of the 2017 (above) indicates that will be true also of proceedings in 2017.

UNDIPLOMATIC TIMES

INDEPENDENT NEWS AND COMMENT ON WORLD AFFAIRS

Tiny satellites are coming into their own as the need for cheap earth observation systems booms.

Why Agenda 2030 is Set to Fail


2 September 2016: A year after the General Assembly adopted “Agenda 2030” as the global plan of action for the next 15 years the project is appearing increasingly Utopian.                    Read More